Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
J Postgrad Med ; 1996 Apr-Jun; 42(2): 43-5
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-116295

ABSTRACT

100 patients with ASA risk I & II and undergoing perianal surgery were studied for anaesthetic effects and postoperative analgesia following either intrathecal pethidine or lignocaine. Saddle block was performed either with intrathecal pethidine 5% (50 mg/ml) 0.5 mg/kg or 1 ml of 5% lignocaine. Sensory and motor block postoperative analgesia, need for additional analgesia were studied. The onset of sensory and motor blockade with lignocaine was faster than pethidine. However the sensory and motor blockade lasted longer with pethidine. The duration of postoperative analgesia was 15.39 +/- 5.14 hours as against duration of postoperative analgesia with lignocaine which was 1.3 +/- 0.53 hours. Only 10% of patients in the pethidine group required intramuscular analgesic supplementation whereas 30% of patients in the lignocaine group required intramuscular analgesic supplementation.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Anesthesia/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Anesthesia, Spinal/methods , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Anus Diseases/surgery , Female , Humans , Lidocaine/therapeutic use , Male , Meperidine/therapeutic use , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL